4--There are no factual errors; there is no ambiguity.
3--The primary facts are accurate, but there are a few details are incorrect.
2--There are a few errors in the primary facts; the details may also have some errors.
1--The primary facts and details contain many errors. There may also be contradictory facts within the presentation.
4--The information is presented in depth; there are few or no details that are left to the viewer's imagination; the viewer is presented with a clear picture of each of the Olympic events that are described.
3--Most of the information is presented in depth; some details of the events are left to the viewer's imagination; the viewer has a good idea what each of the Olympic events that are described should look like.
2--Some of the information is presented in depth, but there are important parts that leave the viewer with an incomplete picture or questions about important aspects of the events that are described. The viewer is required to use his or her imagination to fill-in a lot of missing information.
1) The description is not in depth. There are few details. The reader is only provided with an incomplete picture of the event.
4--The proposal keeps the readers attention. The proposal is organized in a clever way to keep the reader's attention. The reader is anxious to move from section to section.
3--The proposal keeps the reader's attention. The proposal is organized in a way that the reader moves easily from section to section. The reader is not bored with any part or does not feel a need to skip any section.
2--Most of the proposal keeps the reader's attention. Parts of the proposal are unclear or cause the reader to be confused. The reader becomes disinterested in parts of the proposal and feels a need to skip parts.
1--Most or all of the proposal turns the reader off. The proposal is unclear or confuses the reader. The reader does not want to read the proposal.
4--The proposal is neatly assembled. The reader is drawn to the proposal. The proposal stands out at first glance when compared to others.
3--The proposal is neatly assembled, but a few details are neglected. The reader is drawn to the proposal.
2--Most of the proposal is neat, but there are significant sections that could be neater. Attention has been paid to major sections, but many details are left unfinished or poorly done. A reader may pass this proposal by.
1--The proposal is sloppy. Major sections are not done or done poorly. A reader probably wouldn't be interested in even picking this proposal up.
Scores by Category
Depth of information:
Creativity and level of interest: