|
||||
Home Local Court Procedures and Personnel Court Architecture & Democracy Order in the Court Web Adventure |
As the population of the Virginia colony grew, so did the number of courts needed to handle conflicts and disputes based on local laws and contracts. These included boundary disputes, and crimes ranging from petty theft to failure to attend church (as required monthly). Enslaved persons and people of color were tried in the local courts for all types of crimes. By the time of the American Revolution there were 60 county courts including the James City County Court pictured below.
The Courthouse pictured above was built in 1770 and served as both the James City County Court and the Hustings Court or the court of the City of Williamsburg. This building handled much of local government. To reinforce the fact that it was the center of local government, the court building was located in the very center of the town on Market Square. Here the community gathered to participate in the training of the Williamsburg Militia Company, to exchange the news of the day, and to buy and sell the goods required in daily life. Since Market Square was in the center of the towns activities, the courthouse steps became a favorite location for events. Public announcements, celebrations and elections for members of the House of Burgesses were all held there and gradually led to public participation in government.
Other elements of court architecture reinforced the respect with which the court was held in the community. These were elements used only or mostly in public buildings, the cupola and the arched shuttered windows. Cupolas have a long history of representing power. From the Pantheon of Rome to the Duomo of Florence, the dome has adorned public building and has meant power based on knowledge and skill. The dome atop the Williamsburg courthouse also represented the classical origins of rule of law. And, though modest in comparison to the domes mentioned above, it towered gracefully above all but the Capitol and Governors Palace, its weather vane reaching to the sky. Inside, architecture and ornament reinforced the power of the court without overlooking its democratic functions. For example, power was reinforced by the central placement of the kings coat of arms above everyone in the court. Then too, the area for the magistrates was fenced off from the rest of the court by a mahogany railing. Here cushioned benches for the magistrates were built into the mahogany paneling along the rounded rear wall of the court room and raised above the level of the rest of the court several steps. The chief magistrate had a tall chair reminiscent of the kings throne. On the other hand, the furniture of the courtroom accentuated the democratic nature of the building and its function. The clerks table sat in the center of the room, at the floor level of the people, but still separate. With the magistrates railing behind it, and a second railing or bar separating the table from the public, the clerks function as go between was established. Interestingly, it was the clerk who understood the law more than any of the judges or magistrates.
Lastly, since trial attendance was frequent and part of the growing ideas of democracy, there had to be a place for the public in the building. The court proceedings were as much theater as justice and there was always a big turnout on court days. However, loitering was discouraged in that the public was required to stand (behind the bar, of course) while all the members of the court itself were seated when not speaking or performing some court function.
|
|||